Contents page: I’d up the inset on the text boxes to move the text off the borders.

Editorial: “…anxious for us to get to the point” should be “eager for us to get to the point.” Also, you can make a long dash by holding shift-option and hitting the dash key. Or maybe it’s just option, I forget.

Nobody: Yeah, see the long dash thing above.

Great issue, but try a 0.125 inset on all the boxes with text in them, makes things a lot easier to read.

Not bad, but not great. Is it really necessary to do another story about the dorms? By the way, what became of Jon Collegio? That guy had chops.

Collegio is back in Oregon working on campaigns after a run at Americans for Tax Reform.

Personally, I thought the Dorms article was great. Was it “necessary”? Maybe not, but it was damn funny. I do question the comparison of PBR and HRD, though. The blue ribbon-winning champion shouldn’t be compared to crap like HRD.

Tyler, there are some tiny things I noticed that you may want to look at before you send it off to be printed:
* In the second-to-bottom line of the first column of your editorial there is an n with a tilde over it (enye?) that seems out of place.
* Churchill’s name is misspelled on page 8 in the second paragraph.
* The line between Mishima and Alger’s responses is thinner than the others. (this is obviously very important, heh)
* The bottom of the Crosswhite Heightwatch box is missing half of a line. This might just be the .pdf??
* The “to celebrate” and “liquid courage” sentences are missing periods on page 9 (I should’ve seen this yesterday, damn.)
* I was incredibly inconsistent in my capitalization of “the” in the Blueprint for Revolution piece. In the same piece there are also some references to the OC that are missing smallcaps.
* Jarvis’ tits aren’t big enough.

Meh. These piddly things don’t take anything away from the issue; it’s a damn good one. Especially the editorial and Quiroz story.

Quiroz story has a typo in the first line. No pun intended.

Olly, you mispelled “res ipsa loquitur.” I’m disgusted.

I almost forgot about this:

Jon Collegio? For fuck’s sake, the guy’s been gone since ’98 or ’99, Casey. What the fuck happened to Tim Dreier or Bret Jacobson for that matter. I can fill you in if you’re interested.

This may just be nitpicking, but the mission statement speaks of the Commentator’s “nineteen-year existence,” yet the magazine was founded in 1983. So unless this issue creates some type of time warp while reading, I just don’t think that’s right.

Damn metric system!