The OC Blog Back Issues Our Mission Contact Us Masthead
Sudsy Wants You to Join the Oregon Commentator
 

ASUO Senate meeting review, or “There are a lot of reasons why politics is necessarily detrimental.”

By setting a zero percent benchmark at its Wednesday night meeting, the ASUO Senate sent a message, loud and clear: “Go Ducks, but LTD can lick my sweaty, shaven nutsack.”

Or something like that. Probably not that exactly, considering that slightly more than half the Senate lacks nutsacks, sweaty and shaven or otherwise. But it was a remarkable act of solidarity with the purportedly bald-scrotumed screamer who frequents campus on his bicycle with attached trailer.

None of the senators who voted for the zero percent Athletics and Contracts Finance Committee benchmark calculated to stick students’ collective middle finger at the Lane Transit District would acknowledge in words that it was calibrated to support campus’ favorite genital depilation enthusiast (assuming Phil Knight doesn’t have a secret hobby). There was something, though, about the glint in their eyes when they said things like “I think we really do some work on it, we could cut a significant ammount of money off of a $1.6 million budget” that said “This one’s for you, nutsack man.”

So LTD Nutsack man, if you’re out there reading this, let it reassure you that, though it may seem you are alone out there, riding in the cold, shouting without knowing whether anyone is really hearing you or the pain in your voice, whether anyone knows just how drenched your testicles are, know that, in spirit, the ASUO is right there beside you.

But seriously, a zero percent benchmark. And not only that, but a zero percent benchmark supported by the ASUO’s top lefties — Jeremy Blanchard and Zachary Stark-MacMillan called for a return for OSPIRG and voted for a zero percent contract benchmark in the same meeting for Pete’s sake, and another vote came from Sandy Weintraub, who has never seen a funding request he didn’t like and would probably vote for it anyway if he did (liberties taken).

It’s pretty much the ASUO equivalent of Bernie Sanders, Patrick Leahy and the late Ted Kennedy casting the decisive votes for massive corporate tax breaks.

I can hear all this publication’s conservative readers tossing their ten-gallon hats into the air and firing their Smith and Wessons wildly. But note that the zero percent may come at the cost of the very two things the ASUO always cites as its raison d’etre, the justification of its existence in the face of skeptical students, the things this magazine’s editor in chief cited in an editorial this year as the reasons not, as his predecessor suggested, to chuck the ASUO into a tire fire. I’m talking about the ability to ride LTD buses by presenting a student ID and the ability, through whatever byzantine means, to obtain tickets to home football and basketball games for the cost of an incidental fee. And, I mean, three if you count OSPIRG, am I right?

Far more likely, the actual allocation could far overshoot the benchmark. The zero percent really is meant to send a message to LTD, presumably, if not a suggestion about what part of students’ anatomy the transit service ought to lick, then to say “We’re not going to spend any more money than we have to on you.” But many senators were pessimistic about how well that will work in practice.

  1. Alex McCafferty says:

    My interpretation of the 0% benchmark is that Senate wanted to send a message to LTD and the AD. If we do come out with a benchmark above 0%, I dont think they are going to deny funding. This will be my 3rd year working with the Athletic Department, and they have always been very approachable, understandable, and professional. If we want more tickets, they will give us more tickets. If we cant afford them I want less, they will give us less without bickering. The real enemy of students is LTD. Their unrealistic demands and their demeanor in the conversation shows a huge lack of respect for student leaders and the budget process.
    Senate’s political firepower should be aimed at LTD first, before we talk about cutting the AD.

  2. Dane says:

    a lucrative meter maid nazi state

    What would we do without you, Zach?

  3. JMB says:

    Next up: getting rid of the metered parking along University Street so that the Athletic Department coaches can have large personal parking spaces in front of their plush new offices in the converted Mac Court.

  4. nike urbanism duk says:

    Very $mart, they are reducing there unholy “carbon footprint” while creating a lucrative meter maid nazi state. Johnson Hall parking should be removed and replaced with some kind of flower garden for these greenwashers.

  5. C.T. Behemoth says:

    Parking garage.

  6. Dane says:

    I like how the University continues to reduce the amount of parking on campus, obviously trying to force students to use alternative methods of transportation while simultaneously cutting bus routes and funding. Smart.

  7. C.T. Behemoth says:

    What the ASUO should do is start working on supporting an LTD route to student housing areas that is free for everyone and falls under the federal grants that subsidize all of that stuff.

    So far, LTD has managed to connect the shit-hole downtown of Springfield (which is endearing for many reasons) with campus, and now they are connecting the aforementioned shit-hole with the new hospital campus. WTF? I get long-term planning, but why not have ASUO and others up there pushing for a route from Autzen to campus that is permanently free…and maybe the route from the student housing over on 24th too. THEN, let students living elsewhere ride, drive or pay their way in from there? Don’t get me wrong, I enjoy the free bus ride…but

    On the other hand, why not make students walk their happy asses 1/2 a mile from Autzen to campus? : ) It’s ‘green’, healthy and on many days…faster than the bus.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.