Is That A Technical Term, Senator?
Arlen Specter (R – PA) to John Roberts (Nom – SCOTUS) on Roe v. Wade:
“Would you think that Roe might be a super-duper precedent?” Specter probed, pointing to times it has been upheld by the Supreme Court.
Tomorrow Specter is expected to “double-dog dare” Roberts to answer questions.
No, it can be antidisestablishmentareversed and remanded.
I’ve been led to understand that a supercalifragilisticexpialidotious precedent is technically unassailable.
Thanks, I figured it was something like that.
Technically, Tim, if it’s a super-duper precedent it has to be be overly-doverly-topsy-turned-diddly-diddly to lose legal force.