The OC Blog Back Issues Our Mission Contact Us Masthead
Sudsy Wants You to Join the Oregon Commentator

Spray Paint

This swastika was spray painted on the carpet of the LGBTQA on Sunday

There has been a candlelight vigil. There has been a march. As DPS continues to investigate the spray painting of a swastika in the office of the LGBTQA, we still have yet to find any answers. And, looking at the happenings going on in the Daily Emerald columns and their comments section, many people are jumping to rather rash conclusions.

Members of the LGBTQA have already tied the swastika directly to the Pacifica Forum, as seen in today’s Emerald, “LGBTQA Co-Director Alex Esparza linked the Forum’s rhetoric to the incident and criticized the ASUO’s decision. ‘I would like to see a student government that takes a stand against acts of hate like this,’ he said as EMU staff were removing the pieces of carpet upon which the symbol was painted.”

This is a slippery slope, legally speaking, as the organizers of the Forum exercise no control over what speakers say.  So even if a speaker got up and incited the crowd to immediately go break into the LGBTQA with spray paint only the speaker would be guilty of incitement.

Of course, now from the other side (quoting here from the Emerald‘s comments section) there has been much discussion as to whether or not the LGBTQA, “may have painted it on their own office floor.” Again, this is a serious allegation, one of political violence as a means to an end.

Before we go any further, let’s discuss the nature of the crime committed. Clearly, no matter what the outcome, the individual or group who perpetrated this act of vandalism is, in some way, mentally unstable. A person of such poor judgement that they are unable to see what such an act means to the whole of society and to the larger discussion that centers around the Pacifica Forum. Additionally, this has not been the first time the EMU has seen such an attack.

During the Summer of 1997, Oregon Commentator staffers returned to their office, room 205, to find the door broken into, open and with swastika stickers all over it. Further, once they entered the room, they found that the Commentator‘s computers had been stolen, more swastikas had been placed all around the room, and the room itself had been destroyed–papers, cabinets, books and other items were violently hurled across the office. Further, a menacing note was left on the desk in the office that was directed towards the members of the Oregon Commentator. The perpetrators were never found.

Having said that, the issue at hand raises some fairly interesting questions, ones we will have to wait to see answered until DPS and eventually EPD (with which a report has still not yet been filed as of this post) finishes their investigation and, hopefully, brings the perpetrators to justice.

1. Why the LGBTQA? Yes, Rojas is a noted homophobe, but the conversation at the Forum itself has not centered around any gay, transgender or other associated topics the LGBTQA advocates for. When the Jewish Student Union and the Black Student Union are right down the hall, don’t they seem like more appropriate targets for Nazis? Or what about the Survival Center, easily the area with the highest concentration of anti-Pacifica protest organizers? And if you were a homophobe, wouldn’t you spray paint some of the things that were more offensive to you in the LGBTQA office (other than the carpet)?

2. Did someone pick the lock? If not, how did the perpetrator get a key to the LGBTQA office?

3. Why would they spray paint one computer screen and one television, but leave everything else in the room untouched?

4. If you are a member of the Pacifica Forum, or a supporter of some of the speakers’ more radical, Nazi ideals, you most likely understand the fight the Pacifica Forum is going through to stay on this campus. The conversation has turned, lately, to the issue of campus safety–one in which Pacifica Forum members have vehemently denied any attacks on students. If the Forum and its supporters are trying to convince people they are not attacking students, why would you, then, attack students (the LGBTQA)?

This situation was out of hand weeks ago. At this point in time, we need answers. And we needed them Sunday.

  1. PTD says:

    In the cases where someone is caught, the perpetrator is most often a member of the ostensibly victimized minority. You see these all the time. Hoaxes are more common than actual “hate crimes”, especially when its vandalism.

  2. Betz says:

    No offense, but “word on the street” is about as valuable as twice-used bumwad. “Word on the street says that Jesus was re-incarnated last Saturday night when he appeared in some street food bought at ‘Off the Waffle’ …”

    I find it just a bit too convenient that there was no sign of forced entry into the LGBQTA office. I have my reservations about jumping to the conclusion that there is a highly trained lock-picking burglar in the Eugene area who also happens to hate the LGBQTA agenda, and likes to vandalize. Instead, what seems more likely is that someone either was left in the building (they hid), OR that they had a key – be it this key was stolen, or used by an inside member for the specific purpose. Of course this is unfounded until further evidence is produced, but this is the theory I would investigate first, as it is the most logical. As one of our sys-admins used to say when troubleshooting potential network problems, “Before you start looking for zebras, start looking for horses and donkeys first.”

    Also on the same vein … I don’t think that the LGBQTA was ‘targeted’ necessarily, I think it was simply a crime of convenience – somewhere either had the key to the office (a ‘borrowed’ key, or used by an inside member), OR they knew of a way to break in. Not to get bogged down into the ‘nature of hate’ argument … I would imagine that the kind of person that spraypaints swastikas in the LGBQTA office would have no qualms about tagging some of the other EMU group offices, like the ones mentioned above. Just saying, as food for thought…

  3. Gsim says:

    Word on the street is the only the computer and television got sprayed because the LGBQTA has been wanting some new electronics for awhile now.

    I mean how can justify a new 42 inch plasma when you’ve got already got a perfectly working TV?

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.